Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 16;185(4):763–774. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3976-3

Table 4.

Results of the best linear mixed-effects models assessing Pseudoroegneria spicata responses to the burned, warming, warming + drying treatments, and Bromus tectorum cover

Fixed effects Random effects
Response Predictor Est. SE df t value P (>) Variance
Year Residual
Cover (%) Intercept 2.55 0.28 4.81 9.20 < 0.001 0.13 ± 0.37 0.47 ± 0.68
Burned − 0.08 0.12 121.03 − 0.66 0.511
Warming − 0.28 0.15 121.03 − 1.89 0.061
Warming + drying − 0.39 0.15 121.10 − 2.61 0.010
B. tectorum cover (%) − 0.21 0.06 122.96 − 3.31 0.001
Aboveground biomass (g) Intercept 1.82 0.40 2.99 4.57 0.020 0.38 ± 0.61 0.47 ± 0.68
Burned − 0.14 0.12 121.04 − 1.14 0.256
Warming − 0.26 0.15 121.04 − 1.71 0.090
Warming + drying − 0.53 0.15 121.07 − 3.56 0.005
B. tectorum cover (%) − 0.16 0.06 122.36 − 2.54 0.012
Reproductive density (tillers plot−1) Intercept 3.30 0.54 5.37 6.10 0.001 0.63 ± 0.79 1.21 ± 1.10
Burned − 0.19 0.20 125.05 − 0.99 0.326
Warming − 0.57 0.24 125.05 − 2.35 0.020
Warming + drying − 1.03 0.24 125.09 − 4.30 < 0.001
B. tectorum cover (%) − 0.26 0.10 127.11 − 2.60 0.010
Seed production (seeds plot−1) Intercept 6.10 0.93 3.75 6.53 0.004 1.82 ± 1.35 3.85 ± 1.96
Burned 0.31 0.35 121.06 − 0.89 0.374
Warming − 0.88 0.43 121.07 − 2.05 0.043
Warming + drying − 1.76 0.43 121.11 − 4.12 < 0.001
B. tectorum cover (%) − 0.43 0.18 122.85 − 2.41 0.017
Individual fecundity (mean seeds stem−1) Intercept 2.75 0.10 26.61 27.98 < 0.001 0.005 ± 0.07 0.11 ± 0.33
Burned − 0.08 0.06 107.37 − 1.29 0.200
Warming − 0.01 0.08 107.66 − 0.19 0.848
Warming + drying − 0.09 0.08 107.52 − 1.17 0.244
B. tectorum cover (%) − 0.02 0.03 91.96 − 0.67 0.504

Values in bold indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Response variables were assessed at the plot level (0.75 m2), except individual fecundity, which is mean seeds stem−1