Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2017 Nov 1;551(7679):187–191. doi: 10.1038/nature24457

Extended Data, Fig. 3. Significant relationship between edge sensitivity and body size across edge response types.

Extended Data, Fig. 3

(except forest core species that are shown in Figure 3 in main manuscript). Vertical lines in each panel indicate median body size of the species per taxonomic group and edge response type (mammals forest no preference, 43.8 g; mammals matrix edge, 47.0 g; reptiles, unknown 97.5 mm). Smoothed curves and 95% confidence bands were obtained from general additive models (GAMs), with the model weighted by a variable that reflects dataset reliability (Methods). GAMs better explained the data than a null model for taxa and edge response types shown. Edge sensitivity ranges from 0.0 (no declines in local abundance due to edge effects) to 1.0 (local extinction due to edge effects).