Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep 2;44(11):1777–1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.020

Table 2.

Differences in cephalometric measurements between control and Treacher Collins (TCS) midface reconstructions.

Measurements (corresponding landmarks) Skeletal
Soft tissue
Controls (n = 52) Unoperated TCS (n = 14) p-values Controls (n = 52) Unoperated TCS (n = 14) p-values
Midface width (zy-zy) 106.8 ± 1.279 90.55 ± 4.475 0.0033b 125.0 ± 2.828 102.1 ± 5.194 0.0009b
Midface length (Soft tissue: gl-sn; Skeletal: gl-ans) 51.80 ± 0.9531 48.46 ± 2.116 0.1665 58.08 ± 1.199 54.75 ± 2.682 0.2714
Midface deptha (Soft tissue: sn-p; Skeletal: ans-m) 91.24 ± 1.018 81.09 ± 1.939 <0.0001b 108.0 ± 1.150 92.13 ± 2.056 <0.0001b
a

For depth both left and right-sided measurements were analysed. The landmarks are as defined in Table 1 (ans: anterior nasal spine, gl: glabella, m: mastoidale, na: nasion, p: preaurale, sn: subnasale, zy: zygion). Values shown are means ± (standard error of mean) SEM.

b

Statistically significant; p-values are from unpaired two-tailed t-test.