. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul 25;26(12):3449–3458. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1663-9

Table 2.

Logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between poor overall HRQOL, gender, perceived discrimination, and other covariates [OR (95% confidence intervals)]

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
Age	1.03 (1.02,1.04) ^***	1.03 (1.02,1.04) ^***	1.03 (1.01,1.04) ^***	0.97 (0.96,0.98) ^***
Female gender	1.62 (1.39,1.89) ^***	1.45 (1.20,1.75) ^***	1.54 (1.27,1.87) ^***	1.53 (1.23,1.89) ^***
Married	1.00 (0.87,1.16)	1.00 (0.86,1.16)	1.12 (0.96,1.30)	1.19 (1.01,1.41) ^*
Perceived discrimination	1.11 (1.08,1.15) ^***	0.98 (0.86,1.12)	1.00 (0.87,1.14)	1.01 (0.87,1.18)
Female gender x Perceived discrimination		1.08 (1.00,1.17) ^*	1.06 (0.99,1.15)	1.06 (0.97,1.16)
Lifetime SES			0.74 (0.67,0.83) ^***	0.88 (0.77,0.99) ^*
Number of medical conditions				1.37 (1.26,1.48) ^***
BMI				0.98 (0.97,0.99) ^***
Physical function ^a				0.86 (0.84,0.88) ^***
ADL				1.22 (1.12,1.33) ^***

Note: Poor overall HRQOL was dichotomized as 14 or more unhealthy days (sum of physical & mental) during the past 30 days.

Higher scores for physical function represent better function.

p < 0.05,

^**

p < 0.01,

^***

p < 0.001.