. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul 25;26(12):3449–3458. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1663-9

Table 3.

Logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between poor physical HRQOL, gender, perceived discrimination, and other covariates [OR (95% confidence intervals)]

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
Age	1.05 (1.03,1.06) ^***	1.05 (1.03,1.06) ^***	1.03 (1.02,1.05) ^***	0.96 (0.95,0.98) ^***
Female gender	1.30 (1.08,1.56) ^**	1.28 (1.03,1.60) ^*	1.34 (1.11,1.62) ^**	1.24 (0.99,1.56)
Married	0.90 (0.75,1.08)	0.90 (0.75,1.08)	0.98 (0.82,1.19)	1.05 (0.85,1.30)
Perceived discrimination	1.07 (1.02,1.11) ^**	1.06 (0.91,1.23)	1.06 (1.01,1.10) ^*	1.05 (0.99,1.10)
Female gender x Perceived discrimination		1.01 (0.92,1.10)
Lifetime SES			0.67 (0.58,0.77) ^***	0.83 (0.70,0.96) ^*
Number of medical conditions				1.41 (1.29,1.55) ^***
BMI				0.97 (0.96,0.99) ^***
Physical function ^a				0.81 (0.79,0.84) ^***
ADL				1.16 (1.06,1.27) ^**

Note: Poor physical HRQOL was dichotomized as 14 or more physically unhealthy days during the past 30 days.

Higher scores for physical function represent better function.

p < 0.05,

^**

p < 0.01,

^***

p < 0.001.