Table 2. Quantitative assessment of image quality based on stents location.
Stent location | DECTA protocols | CT attenuation | Image noise | SNR | CNR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 CIA | |||||
DECTA [19] | 65 | 462.20±101.62 | 42.10±17.72 | 12.88±8.53 | 20.44±16.80 |
68 | 420.50±90.43 | 38.45±16.17 | 12.93±9.11 | 19.37 ±13.40 | |
70 | 397.50±87.52 | 38.51±15.47 | 11.65±7.62 | 17.65±10.67 | |
72 | 374.50±82.84 | 38.59±15.54 | 10.93±7.35 | 15.72±8.81 | |
Conventional CTA [14] | 428.70±92.17 | 48.46±23.70 | 11.11±5.60 | 9.62±4.92 | |
2 EIA | |||||
DECTA [3] | 65 | 562.70±36.50 | 32.78±13.20 | 18.40±8.49 | 20.20±2.14 |
68 | 508.80±33.10 | 31.52±13.27 | 17.42±8.28 | 19.61±3.33 | |
70 | 476.40±31.20 | 31.34±13.59 | 16.47±8.01 | 18.38±4.03 | |
72 | 446.20±29.42 | 31.53±14.04 | 15.33±7.49 | 16.82±4.55 | |
Conventional CTA [2] | 637.00±447.72 | 61.52±39.67 | 10.12±0.75 | 8.93±1.43 | |
3 SFA | |||||
DECTA [7] | 65 | 320.80±199.60 | 48.19±23.42 | 8.83±9.65 | 18.87±19.06 |
68 | 288.90±181.78 | 45.25±21.04 | 8.46±9.44 | 17.63±17.81 | |
70 | 269.70±171.10 | 43.95±19.55 | 8.04±9.05 | 16.14±16.23 | |
72 | 251.70±161.14 | 42.97±18.26 | 8.90±8.88 | 14.57±14.88 | |
Conventional CTA [6] | 427.10±147.84 | 63.69 ±17.84 | 7.52±3.78 | 6.42±3.58 |
CT number in Hounsfield units; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio in the stented area; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio. Image process: comparison between 4 keVs and conventional CTA. CIA, common iliac artery; EIA, external iliac artery; SFA, superficial femoral artery.