Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct;7(5):520–531. doi: 10.21037/qims.2017.10.07

Table 2. Quantitative assessment of image quality based on stents location.

Stent location DECTA protocols CT attenuation Image noise SNR CNR
1 CIA
   DECTA [19] 65 462.20±101.62 42.10±17.72 12.88±8.53 20.44±16.80
68 420.50±90.43 38.45±16.17 12.93±9.11 19.37 ±13.40
70 397.50±87.52 38.51±15.47 11.65±7.62 17.65±10.67
72 374.50±82.84 38.59±15.54 10.93±7.35 15.72±8.81
   Conventional CTA [14] 428.70±92.17 48.46±23.70 11.11±5.60 9.62±4.92
2 EIA
   DECTA [3] 65 562.70±36.50 32.78±13.20 18.40±8.49 20.20±2.14
68 508.80±33.10 31.52±13.27 17.42±8.28 19.61±3.33
70 476.40±31.20 31.34±13.59 16.47±8.01 18.38±4.03
72 446.20±29.42 31.53±14.04 15.33±7.49 16.82±4.55
   Conventional CTA [2] 637.00±447.72 61.52±39.67 10.12±0.75 8.93±1.43
3 SFA
   DECTA [7] 65 320.80±199.60 48.19±23.42 8.83±9.65 18.87±19.06
68 288.90±181.78 45.25±21.04 8.46±9.44 17.63±17.81
70 269.70±171.10 43.95±19.55 8.04±9.05 16.14±16.23
72 251.70±161.14 42.97±18.26 8.90±8.88 14.57±14.88
   Conventional CTA [6] 427.10±147.84 63.69 ±17.84 7.52±3.78 6.42±3.58

CT number in Hounsfield units; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio in the stented area; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio. Image process: comparison between 4 keVs and conventional CTA. CIA, common iliac artery; EIA, external iliac artery; SFA, superficial femoral artery.