Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;96(44):e8486. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008486

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cumulative overall survivals and progression free survivals after propensity score weighting by treatment type The cumulative OS rates were significantly higher in the SR (P < .001) and RFA (P = .027) group than in the TACE group, respectively (A). The cumulative PFS rates were significantly higher in the SR (P < .001) and RFA (P < .001) group than in the TACE group, respectively (B). However, the cumulative OS and PFS rates of SR group showed no significant difference compared with those of RFA group (P = .116 and P = .252, respectively) (A and B). OS = overall survival, PFS = progression-free survival, RFA = radio frequency ablation, SR = surgical resection, TACE =  transarterial chemoembolization.