Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;33(11):1753–1759. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1157-4

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and hemodynamics

Total (n = 98) Adenosine control* (n = 50) Regadenoson control (n = 24) Adenosine caffeine <4 h* (n = 15) Regadenoson caffeine <4 h (n = 9)
Age (years) 65 ± 11 67 ± 11 66 ± 11 67 ± 11 59 ± 11
Male 16 (49) 22 (44) 11 (46) 8 (53) 5 (56)
Systolic RR rest (mm Hg) 148 ± 20 146 ± 28 147 ± 19 144 ± 20 151 ± 21
Systolic RR stress (mm Hg) 135 ± 20 142 ± 23 133 ± 19 139 ± 15 139 ± 23
Diastolic RR rest (mm Hg) 88 ± 12 85 ± 19 89 ± 12 83 ± 9 85 ± 9
Diastolic RR stress (mm Hg) 81 ± 12 80 ± 10 82 ± 11 79 ± 7 79 ± 14
HR rest (bpm) 78 ± 18 76 ± 15 82 ± 18 70 ± 7 67 ± 12
HR stress (bpm) 100 ± 20 87 ± 14 107 ± 18 81 ± 10 84 ± 12
HRR (%) 21 16 32 16 26
Systolic RR response†† (%) −5 ± 10 −2 ± 12 −9 ± 7 −3 ± 7 −8 ± 5
Diastolic RR response (%) −5 ± 10 −4 ± 11 −7 ± 9 −4 ± 8 −8 ± 10

HRR—% change in HR from rest to stress

††Systolic RR response—% change in systolic RR

Diastolic RR response—% change in diastolic RR. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%)

*Results as previously reported by Kuijpers et al. [14]