TABLE 5.
Study, year (ref) | Study context | Comparison | Key finding |
Röös et al., 2015 (47) | Sweden | Current Swedish diet, recommended Nordic diet, and LCHF diet, all adjusted to same energy content | Compared with the recommended Nordic diet, the biodiversity impacts were ∼25% higher for the current diet and ∼60% higher for the LCHF diet |
Baroni et al., 2007 (115) | Italy | Average Italian diet and 3 other well-balanced diets: omnivorous (2105 kcal/d), vegetarian (2158 kcal/d), and vegan (2298 kcal/d), produced by using conventional or organic systems | Biodiversity impacts were much higher for the average Italian diet than for any of the 3 well-balanced diets; also, biodiversity impacts were generally higher for diets based on organic farming; biodiversity impacts were lowest for the vegan diet |
Notarnicola et al., 2017 (79) | European Union | Basket of 17 foods representative of European Union consumption—scenario 1: 25% reduction in beef, dairy, pork, poultry, and eggs substituted with a 25% increase in bread; scenario 2: as above but with 50% reductions or increases | Scenarios 1 and 2 reduced the estimated soil carbon loss by ∼18% and 36%, respectively |
LCHF, low-carbohydrate, high-fat; ref, reference.