Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;4(5):193–198. doi: 10.1049/htl.2017.0065

Table 1.

Monte Carlo simulation results for first kind of surgical tool with various reference tool size l and working distance d. Null hypothesis for test 1 is Σsim=Σpre and test 2 is H0:μsim=μpre,Σsim=Σpre

Case Ref. size Working distance Accepted RMS percent difference summary statistics
l, mm d, mm 1, % 2, % Mean, % Std. dev, % Max, % Min, %
1 32 100 93.00 97.00 0.04 1.28 3.10 −2.94
2 32 200 95.00 99.00 −0.06 1.39 3.75 −4.23
3 32 300 95.00 95.00 −0.01 1.16 3.41 −3.36
4 32 400 97.00 94.00 0.07 1.23 3.09 −2.67
5 64 100 97.00 100.00 0.14 1.11 3.43 −2.05
6 64 200 97.00 99.00 0.02 1.01 2.13 −3.24
7 64 300 95.00 96.00 0.08 1.26 4.41 −3.02
8 64 400 98.00 100.00 0.06 1.22 3.38 −2.68