Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;17:760. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3741-3

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in the meta-analysis

Reference Year of study Country Study design group sample size Mean/median size (cm) Median FU(range, mo) Quality score
Kim [25] 2012 (1998–2011) Korea Retro LAP 24 6.1 62.6(8.9–164.4) 17.5
OPEN 14 7.2 58.3(18.8–123.2)
Lin [17] 2014 (2007–2012) China Retro LAP 23 7.2 34.0(6–78) 18
OPEN 23 7.3
Hsiao [26] 2014 (2002–2012) Taiwan Retro LAP 18 6.3 37.2(16.8–133.2) 17
OPEN 21 6 67.2(12.0–133.2)
Takahashi [27] 2015 (1995–2011) Japan Retro LAP 15 5.5 57(7–120) 16.5
OPEN 12 7.5 69(13–154)
Piessen [28] 2015 (2001–2013) France Retro LAP 90 NA NA 17.5
OPEN 93
Chun [29] 2016(2002–2015) Singapore Retro LAP 23 6 20.5(0–163) 17
OPEN 36 6 78(2–151)
Our own study 2015(2008–2015) China Retro LAP 13 6 48(26–78) 17.5
OPEN 13 6 42(11–83)

Retro retrospective observational study, LAP laparoscopic resection, OPEN open resection, FU follow up, mo months, NA not available