Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;17:760. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3741-3

Table 3.

GRADE profile evidence of the included studies

Outcome indicator No. of studies Quality assessment No. of patients Effect Quality Importance
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision publication bias LAP OPEN Relative (95% CI) Absolute
Operation time 5 no serious risk of bias very seriousa no serious indirectness seriousb None 90 86 WMD −0.87
(−47.50~47.75)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low
IMPORTANT
Blood loss 5 no serious risk of bias serious no serious indirectnessa seriousb None 89 108 WMD −34.38
(−79.60~10.84)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low
IMPORTANT
Postoperative complications 6 no serious risk of bias no serious inconsistency no serious indirectness seriousa Maybed 185 194 RR 0.65
(0.38~1.12)c
⊕ ⊕ ⊝⊝
low
CRITICAL
Postoperative hospital stay 6 no serious risk of bias very seriousa no serious indirectness seriousb None 113 122 WMD −2.01
(−3.83~ − 0.18)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low
IMPORTANT
Overall recurrence rate 7 no serious risk of bias no serious inconsistency no serious indirectness seriousa None 203 214 RR 0.56
(0.29~1.06)c
⊕ ⊕ ⊕⊝
moderate
CRITICAL
Disease-free survival 5 no serious risk of bias no serious inconsistency no serious indirectness no serious imprecision None 162 171 HR 0.40
(0.17~0.91)
⊕ ⊕ ⊕⊝
moderate
CRITICAL
Overall survival 4 no serious risk of bias no serious inconsistency no serious indirectness serious None 149 158 HR 0.11
(0.03~0.43)
⊕ ⊕ ⊕⊝
moderate
CRITICAL

LAP laparoscopic resection, OPEN open resection

ahave serious heterogeneity(I 2 > 75%)

bthe sample size of included patients is too small

cthe confidence interval of RR include 1

dexist publication bias