Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 13.
Published in final edited form as: Astron Astrophys. 2017 Jul;603:A124. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730459

Table 3.

Best fit LVG model parameters and comparison with the column density obtained with the rotational diagram (RD) analysis.

LVG calculations
RD analysis*
Tk [K] n(H2) [cm−3] N(X)LVG [cm−2] N(X)RD [cm−2]
o-H2CO ~200 ~106 4.0 × 1013 (4.4 ± 0.6) × 1013
p-H2CO ~200 ~106 1.8 × 1013 (1.6 ± 0.1) × 1013
HC3N ~80 ~106 4.0 × 1011 (4.2 ± 0.3) × 1011
A-CH3CN ~150 ~106 5.0 × 1011 (5.8 ± 0.8) × 1011
E-CH3CN ~150 ~106 6.0 × 1011 (5.7 ± 0.7) × 1011
E-CH3OH ~40 ~3×107 1.9 × 1013 (1.9 ± 0.2) × 1013

Notes.

*

Rotational diagram analysis assuming uniform beam filling (see Sect. 5.4).