Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;10:593. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2913-1

Table 2.

Relative concentration of samples for each tissue type

Tissue Sample type Efficiency Concentration Relative error
Breast tumor
 mtDNA 2.08 129.3 1.29
 mtDNA/10 2.13 6.87 1.47
 Nuclear 2.02 1 1
 Nuclear/10 1.99 0.16 1.4
Breast normal
 mtDNA 2.19 132.13 1.4
 mtDNA/10 2.02 38.54 1.36
 Nuclear 2.03 1 1
 Nuclear/10 2.02 0.09 1.38
Colon tumor
 mtDNA 2.13 132.72 1.35
 mtDNA/10 2.1 12.95 1.32
 Nuclear 2.01 1 1
 Nuclear/10 2.01 0.09 1.45
Colon normal
 mtDNA 2.11 219.19 1.5
 mtDNA/10 2.11 20.82 1.56
 Nuclear 2.05 1 1
 Nuclear/10 1.99 0.2 1.51
Prostate tumor
 mtDNA 2.17 134.14 1.41
 mtDNA/10 2.11 15.79 1.39
 Nuclear 2.04 1 1
 Nuclear/10 2 0.16 1.47
Prostate normal
 mtDNA 2.12 172.65 1.49
 mtDNA/10 2.08 22.21 1.47
 Nuclear 2.02 1 1
 Nuclear/10 2.01 0.13 1.55

The nuclear DNA concentration is taken as reference, and is therefore 1. The relative error (confidence ratio) is also 1 as there is no uncertainty associated with it. The other concentrations are relative to nuclear DNA and the relative error associated with it. The values for the efficiency are the average taken over the replicas