Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov;15(6):515–522. doi: 10.1370/afm.2136

Table 1.

Association Between BB Index Score and Risk of Emergency Hospital Admission in the Prospective Cohort Analysis (N = 8,248)

BB Index Score Patients, No. Unadjusted Adjusteda

Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Of the patient
 0 95 1.589 (0.970–2.604) .07 2.272 (1.371–3.764) .001
 Q1 (>0 to <0.247) 1,892 1.188 (0.953–1.482) .13 1.123 (0.882–1.431) .35
 Q2 (0.247 to <0.383) 1,891 1.091 (0.875–1.358) .44 1.050 (0.830–1.329) .69
 Q3 (0.383 to <0.567) 1,901 1.101 (0.885–1.369) .39 1.053 (0.837–1.323) .66
 Q4 (0.567 to <1) 1,894 1.031 (0.829–1.281) .78 0.963 (0.768–1.206) .74
 1 (ref) 575 1.000 1.000
Of the practice, average
 Q1 (<0.336) 2,085 1.083 (0.915–1.282) .35 0.968 (0.809–1.158) .70
 Q2 (0.366 to <0.436) 2,017 0.916 (0.771–1.089) .32 0.853 (0.718–1.014) .07
 Q3 (0.436 to <0.535) 2,068 0.871 (0.735–1.031) .11 0.878 (0.744–1.037) .12
 Q4 (0.535) (ref) 2,078 1.000 1.000

BB=Bice and Boxerman; Q=quartile ref=reference category.

Note: Estimated hazard ratios are from mixed-effects Weibull regression analysis.

a

Adjusted for age, sex, number of general practitioner consultations, having had a previous emergency hospital admission in 2010–2012, deprivation level, general practitioner practice location (urban/rural), number of general practitioners in a practice, and the following morbidities: diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, epilepsy, cancer, stroke, coronary heart disease, chronic renal disease, depression and schizophrenia. For the complete table, see Supplemental Table 2 (http://www.annfammed.org/content/15/6/515/suppl/DC1).