Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Feb 26;17(2):167–186. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2016.1275911

Table 3.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Models of Heavy Drinking Class Membership

MEN (n=1447) WOMEN (n=1579)


Persistent High vs. Declining Persistent High vs. Declining


Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Race/ethnicity (ref=White)
   Black 1.15 (0.62–2.13) 1.09 (0.57–2.07) 2.65 (1.44–4.89)** 1.95 (1.07–3.53)*
   Latino 1.70 (0.98–2.96) 1.67 (0.95–2.91) 1.80 (0.78–4.17) 1.59 (0.70–3.63)
Age 1.02 (1.00–1.03)* 1.02 (1.00–1.03)* 1.03 (1.01–1.05)* 1.03 (1.01–1.05)**
Family history of alcoholism (y/n) 1.20 (0.81–1.76) 1.15 (0.77–1.70) 1.31 (0.84–2.05) 1.08 (0.69–1.68)
Cumulative SED (range: 0–6) 1.05 (0.89–1.25) 1.43 (1.17–1.76)***


Persistent High vs. Stable Low Persistent High vs. Stable Low


Race/ethnicity (ref=White)
   Black 1.09 (0.54–2.19) 0.90 (0.46–1.76) 1.57 (0.87–2.83) 1.14 (0.64–2.02)
   Latino 1.38 (0.76–2.53) 1.19 (0.63–2.25) 1.07 (0.51–2.24) 0.93 (0.44–1.99)
Age 0.98 (0.97–1.00)* 0.98 (0.96–1.00)* 0.98 (0.96–1.00)* 0.98 (0.96–1.00)*
Family history of alcoholism (y/n) 1.37 (0.86–2.19) 1.21 (0.77–1.92) 1.99 (1.31–3.03)*** 1.56 (1.03–2.37)*
Cumulative SED (range: 0–6) 1.23 (0.96–1.58) 1.50 (1.25–1.79)***

Notes. Relative risk ratios shown. SED = socioeconomic disadvantage.

p<.10,

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p≤.001.