Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 28;47(12):2585–2601. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7

Table 4.

Pre- versus post-intervention strength analysis on isolation exercise

Study N Age, y [range or mean ± SD] Frequency/duration Testing modality Sets (reps) Training loads Weekly sets per exercise Pre- vs post-intervention kg, mean ± SD Pre- vs post-intervention% strength difference, kg (mean) p value (pre- vs post-intervention) ES
Paulsen et al. [19] 18 20–30 3 per wk
For 6 wk
KExt 1 (7) 7 RM LWS 125.8 ± 16.7 vs 144 ± 14.4 18.2 (14.5) ≤0.01a 1.17
KExt 3 (7) MWS 117.8 ± 13.5 vs 142.5 ± 8.9 24.7 (21.0) ≤0.01a/≤0.05b 2.16
Paulsen et al. [19] 18 20–30 3 per wk
For 6 wk
LC 1 (7) 7 RM LWS 57.3 ± 9.6 vs 64.8 ± 7.6 7.5 (13.1) ≤0.01a 0.87
LC 3 (7) MWS 55.9 ± 10.3 vs 65.3 ± 13.1 9.4 (16.8) ≤0.01a/≤0.05b 0.80
Baker et al. [21] 16 18–21 3 per wk
For 8 wk
BC 1 (6) 6 RM LWS 41.1 ± 5.6 vs 49.5 ± 4.9 8.4 (20.3) ≤0.05 one tailedc 1.60
BC 3 (6) MWS 43.0 ± 4.5 vs 51.0 ± 7.9 7.8 (18.6) ≤0.05 one tailedc 1.24
Bottaro et al. [23] 24 22.2 ± 3.2 2 per wk
For 12 wk
KExt 1 (8–12) 8–12 RM LWS 24.3 ± 3.0 vs 25.3 ± 2.9 1.0 (4.1) ? 0.34
KExt 3 (8–12) MWS 20.9 ± 3.2 vs 23.4 ± 2.3 2.4 (12.0) ≤0.05c 0.90
Bottaro et al. [23] 24 22.2 ± 3.2 2 per wk
For 12 wk
EExt 1 (8–12) 8–12 RM LWS 51.4 ± 10.9 vs 55.2 ± 10.2 3.8 (7.4) ≤0.05c 0.36
EExt 3 (8–12) MWS 45.6 ± 5.9 vs 48.3 ± 8.2 2.7 (5.9) ≤0.05c 0.38
Reid [24] 34 18–35 3 per wk
For 8 wk
KFlex 1 (10–12) 3–18 RM LWS 34.2 ± 6.4 vs 39.7 ± 8 5.5 (16.1) ≤0.05c 0.76
KFlex 1 (15) LWS2 40.4 ± 9.2 vs 42.8 ± 8.4 2.4 (5.9) ? 0.27
KFlex 3 (6) MWS 35.2 ± 5.3 vs 40 ± 5.6 4.8 (13.6) ≤0.01a 0.88
Reid [24] 34 18–35 3 per wk
For 8 wk
KExt 1 (10–12) 3–18 RM LWS 80.5 ± 15.8 vs 95.5 ± 17.8 15.0 (18.6) ≤0.01a 0.89
KExt 1 (15) LWS2 86.8 ± 5.8 vs 99.7 ± 7.7 12.9 (14.9) ≤0.05c 1.89
KExt 3 (6) MWS 90.0 ± 16.7 vs 103.6 ± 16.4 13.6 (15.1) ≤0.01a 0.82
Reid [24] 34 18–35 3 per wk
For 8 wk
EFlex 1 (10–12) 3–18 RM LWS 39.3 ± 4.2 vs 43.9 ± 6.3 4.6 (11.7) ≤0.01a 0.86
EFlex 1 (15) LWS2 39.2 ± 5.2 vs 47.1 ± 9.7 7.9 (20.2) ≤0.05c 1.02
EFlex 3 (6) MWS 42 ± 5.2 vs 45.5 ± 6.9 3.5 (8.3) ≤0.05c 0.57
Reid [24] 34 18–35 3 per wk
For 8 wk
EExt 1 (10–12) 3–18 RM LWS 28.5 ± 7 vs 35 ± 10.8 5.5 (22.8) ≤0.01a 0.71
EExtd 1 (15) LWS2 31.4 ± 4.8 vs 44.4 ± 5.5 13 (41.4) ≤0.01a 2.52
EExt 3 (6) MWS 33.4 ± 8.1 vs 40.3 ± 10.3 6.9 (20.7) ? 0.74
Reid [24] 34 18–35 3 per wk
For 8 wk
SFlexd 1 (10–12) 3–18 RM LWS 47.3 ± 10.7 vs 58.3 ± 10.7 11 (23.3) ≤0.01a 1.03
SFlex 1 (15) LWS2 48 ± 6.5 vs 55 ± 3.3 7 (14.6) ≤0.05c 1.36
SFlex 3 (6) MWS 52.9 ± 11.9 vs 64.4 ± 9.8 11.5 (21.7) ≤0.05c 1.05
Reid [24] 34 18–35 3 per wk
For 8 wk
SExt 1 (10–12) 3–18 RM LWS 48.2 ± 11.1 vs 54.8 ± 11.2 6.6 (13.7) ? 0.59
SExt 1 (15) LWS2 48.8 ± 8.7 vs 54.6 ± 10.6 5.8 (12.0) ? 0.60
SExt 3 (6) MWS 51.8 ± 9.1 vs 66.5 ± 11.1 14.7 (28.4) ≤0.01e 1.44
Sooneste et al. [25] 8 25.0 ± 2.1 2 per wk
For 12 wk
SPC 1 (8) 8 RM LWS 9.1 ± 1.6 vs 10.9 ± 2.5 1.8 (19.8) ≤0.05c 0.86
SPC 3 (8) MWS 9.1 ± 1.6 vs 11.9 ± 2.9 2.8 (30.8) ≤0.05c 1.20

? Data not available, BC bicep curl, EExt elbow extension, EFlex elbow flexion, KExt knee extension, KFlex knee flexion, kg kilograms, LC leg curl, LWS low weekly sets per exercise (≤5), LWS2 low weekly sets per exercise data set two, MWS medium weekly sets per exercise (5–9), N number of subjects, per wk number of days trained per week, Reps repetitions, RM repetition maximum, SD standard deviation, SExt shoulder extension, SFlex shoulder flexion, SPC seated preacher curl, y years

aSignificant differences between groups (p ≤ 0.01)

bSignificantly greater than prior to training (p ≤ 0.05)

cStatistically significant difference compared with control group (p ≤ 0.05)

dData excluded from analysis

eSignificant differences between groups (p ≤ 0.01)