Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 5;7(3 Suppl):116S–137S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217706366

Table 4.

Evidence Summary Table.

KQ1. What is the efficacy and effectiveness of MPSS compared with no pharmacologic treatment? Effect Size
Outcome No. of Studies; Sample Size Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication Bias Overall Quality of Evidence Mean Difference (95% CI, P Value)
Motor scores 6 months 2 RCTs (N = 414)23,24 12 months 2 RCTs (N = 335)22,25 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 6 months 1.19 (−2.34, 4.72); P = .51 12 months −1.17 (−4.80, 2.47); P = .53
Pinprick 6 months 1 RCTs (N = 296)23 12 months 2 RCTs (N = 334)22,25 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 6 months 3.37 (0.75, 5.99); P = .01 12 months 0.18 (−2.66, 3.02); P = .90
Light touch 6 months 1 RCTs (N = 294) 23 12 months 2 RCTs (N = 334) 22,25 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 6 months 2.88 (0.10, 5.66); P = .04 12 months 0.74 (−2.12, 3.61); P = .61
KQ2. What is the safety profile of MPSS compared with no pharmacologic treatment? MPSS % Control %
Death 3 RCTs (N = 530)2224,27 1 non RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 2.58% (8/310) 4.87% (15/308) −1.51 (−4.13, 1.12); P = .26
Wound infection 3 RCTs (N = 434)22,23,25,27 1 Non-RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 4.26% (11/258) 2.27% (6/264) 0.98 (−1.70, 3.66); P = .47
GI hemorrhage 3 RCTs (N = 434)22,23,25,27 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 6.07% (13/214) 2.27% (5/20) 4.51 (−1.92, 10.94); P = 17
Sepsis 3 RCTs (N = 434)22,23,25,27 1 Non-RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 5.81% (15/258) 4.92% (13/264) 0.74 (−2.88, 4.35); P = .69
PE 2 RCTs (N = 238)22,23,25 1 Non-RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 8.09% (19/235) 4.592% (111/241) 2.94 (−0.15, 6.03); P = .06
Urinary infection 3 RCTs (N = 434)22,23,25,27 1 Non-RCT (N = 88) No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 35.27% (91/258) 34.47% (1/264) 1.73 (−5.04, 8.49); P = .62
Pneumonia 1 RCT (N = 156) 1 Non-RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 25.50% (51/200) 21.33% (45/211) 4.69 (−3.19, 12.57); P = .24
Decubitis 2 RCTs (N = 238)22,23,27 1 Non-RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate 15.7% (35/223) 14.96% (35/234) 20.99 (−6.01, 7.98); P = .78
One or more complications 1 Non- RCT28 (N = 411) No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Very low 33.48% (78/233) 46.07% (82/178) −12.59 (−22.10, −3.09); P = .009
KQ3. What is the evidence that MPSS has differential efficacy or safety in subpopulations?
MPSS administered within 8 hours
Motor scores Final follow-up (6-12 months) 3 RCTs (N = 300)22,24,25 Median time 3 months 1 Non-RCT (N = 88)26 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious risk of imprecision Undetected Moderate RCTs: 3.88 (0.50, 7.27); P = .02 RCTs + Prospective cohort: 3.21 (0.10, 6.33); P = .04

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GI, gastrointestinal; MPSS, methylprednisolone sodium succinate; PE, pulmonary embolism; RCT, randomized controlled trial.