Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;5(4):e00333. doi: 10.1002/prp2.333

Table 1.

Summary of the pharmacological profile of nonpeptide NOP agonists in comparison with N/OFQ

GTPγ[35S] Calcium mobilization Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer Mouse Vas Deferens
G protein β‐arrestin 2
CR α CR α Selectivity (NOP vs OP) CR α CR α Bias factor CR α Selectivity(+/+ vs. −/−)
N/OFQ 1 1.00 1 1.00 >10000 1 1.00 1 1.00 0.00 1 1.00 >100
Ro 65‐6570 12 1.11 14 0.98 270 16 0.96 65 0.74 1.64 4 >1 7
Ro 2q 14 0.88 10 0.99 100 28 0.93 63 0.43 0.93 1.70 >1 3
SCH‐221510 13 1.04 36 0.94 60 36 1.10 55 0.84 1.10 11 >1 2
MCOPPB 0.30 1.19 0.52 1.03 1500 0.53 1.04 1 0.99 0.97 0.71 >1 14
AT‐403 1.20 0.91 1 0.96 1500 4 0.94 5 0.79 0.16 0.40 >1 30
AT‐202 48 0.95 120 1.01 250 90 0.96 105 0.89 0.46 6 >1 9
SCH‐486757 155 1.12 380 0.99 80 135 0.82 178 0.36 0.81

Agonist efficacy is expressed as intrinsic activity (α) calculated as the ratio between the E max of the ligand and that of the standard agonist N/OFQ.

Agonist potency is expressed as concentration ratio (CR) calculated as the ratio between the EC50 of the ligand and that of the standard agonist N/OFQ.