Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;12(5):431–438. doi: 10.1177/1558944716677338

Table 1.

Case Series: Surgical Volume, Follow-up, Time to Surgery, Findings, and Complications.

Author Repairs Mean follow-up (range), mo Average age, y Study findings Complications
van Riet et al35 23 93 (7-264) 47 Peak strength of 82% as compared with contralateral side (range, 75%-106%)
ROM, 10°-136°
All patients had 4-5/5 strength testing
3 (13%) reruptures
1 patient had olecranon avulsion, ulnar neuropathy, and required HWR
Average 10° loss ROM
Mirzayan et al21 150 NR 49 Neither outcome scores, strength, nor ROM BT fixation: anchor fixation
Reoperation rate (2.1% vs 9.4%)*
Infection rate (0% vs. 5.2%)*
Mair et al19 11 36 (NR) 29 All regained full ROM without weakness
10/11 returned to professional football
1 (9%) rerupture
Bava et al4 5 32 (18-49) 47 Postoperative:
DASH: 1.4
ASES: 99.2
Mayo Elbow: 95.8
Oxford Elbow (pain), 96; (function), 100; (social), 96
NR
Kokkalis et al17 11 21 (12-40) 53 Preoperative → postoperative VAS: 8.5 → 2.4
Preoperative → postoperative strength:1.6 → 4.8
Postoperative arc of motion: 136°
9/11 patients “very satisfied” and returned to full work
Loss of 7° arc of motion
1/11 (9%) had postoperative pain over suture knot
Farrar and Lippert (1981)12 3 10 (9-12) 48 3/4 (75%) had 4/5 strength
1/4 (25%) had 5/5 strength
NR
Sierra et al29 11 17 (7-168) 50 10/11 (91%) in follow-up returned to preinjury activity
2/11 (18%) had 4/5 strength
9/11 (82%) had 5/5 strength
1 (6%) rerupture
1 (6%) radial nerve palsy
1 (6%) ulnar neuropathy
Sollender et al31 4 NR 42 1 patient suture repair
3 patients—NR
4/4 patients were weight lifters using anabolic steroids
2/4 patients had local steroid injection
1 (25%) rerupture—early return to aggressive weight lifting
1 (25%) contralateral triceps rupture
Kose et al18 8 19 (12-26) 25 All patients satisfied; all returned to previous level of function
6/8 (75%) excellent Mayo, 2/8 (25%) good Mayo
5/5 strength in all
1 (13%) ulnar nerve entrapment, required release
1 (13%) PIN palsy
Yoon et al41 2 19 (5-60) 21 3/4 (75%) had ROM 0°-140° with full strength 1 (25%) 10° loss of extension
Neumann et al24 7 12 (NR) 49 Mean DASH, 10.3
6/7 (83%) had full ROM
1 (14%) had loss of flexion (110°)

Note. ROM = range of motion; HWR = hardware removal; NR = not reported; BT = bone tunnel; DASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; ASES = American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Mayo = Mayo Elbow Score; VAS = Visual Analog Scale; PIN = posterior interosseous nerve.

*

Not statistically significant.