Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Sep 26;65(39):8634–8642. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03261

Table 1.

Comparison of the 1H (mult., J in Hz) and 13C NMR Spectroscopic Data of Compounds 1 and 2 in CD3OD.a,b,c

position 1 2

δH δC δH δC
1 106.8 106.7
2 163.5 162.6
3 6.17 (d, 2.2) 95.9 6.18 (d, 2.2) 95.4
4 166.8 166.3
5 5.91 (d, 2.2) 100.0 5.94 (d, 2.2) 98.1
6 169.3 167.7
7 10.11 (s) 193.2 204.8
1′ 4.96 (d, 7.4) 102.1 5.02 (d, 7.4) 102.0
2′ 3.50 (t, 7.4) 74.7 3.54 (t, 7.4) 74.7
3′ 3.46 (m) 78.4 3.46 (m) 78.5
4′ 3.41 (m) 71.1 3.42 (m) 71.1
5′ 3.46 (m) 77.9 3.46 (m) 78.3
6′ 3.91, (dd, 12.0, 1.8) 62.3 3.92, (dd, 12.0, 1.8) 62.4
3.72, (dd, 12.0, 4.9) 3.72, (dd, 12.0, 4.9)
CH3 2.69 (s) 33.5
a

Measured at 400 MHz for 1H NMR with residual signals of CD3OD at δ 3.31 ppm used as reference.

b

Measured at 100 MHz for 13C NMR with residual signals of CD3OD at δ 49.0 ppm used as reference.

c

Assignments supported by 2D NMR experiments.