Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2017 Sep 1;60:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.002

Table 1.

Estimates (γ) and Standard Errors (SE) from Multi-Level Models Predicting Mothers’ Reported Warmth with Youth, N = (762)

Variables Model 1 Model 2
γ SE γ SE
Intercept 4.15*** .04 4.14*** .04
Mother-youth warmth (T-1) −.42*** .04 −.43*** .04
Age −.06*** .01 −.06*** .01
Birth order −.15*** .03 −.12*** .03
Gender (female = 0, male =1) −.10*** .02 −.09*** .02
Sibling gender constellation −.04 .04 −.04 .04
Sibship size .00 .03 .00 .03
Differential affection (PDA; T-1) .02* .01 .03 .02
Differential discipline (PDD; T-1) .01 .01 −.02 .01
Mother-youth discrepancy in differential affection (DDA; T-1) −.03* .01 −.06** .02
Mother-youth discrepancy in differential discipline (DDD; T-1) .00 .01 −.01 .02
Birth order X PDA .04 .02
Birth order X PDD .08*** .02
Birth order X DDA .02 .03
Birth order X DDD .03 .02
PDA X DDA −.05** .02
PDD X DDD −.01 .01
*

p < .05.

**

p .01.

***

p < .001.

NOTE: T-1 signifies predictor variables measured in the year prior to the dependent variable. Controls that were not significant in any model were excluded from the tables: sibling age spacing and parents’ education. Two three-way interactions, birth order X PDA X DDA, and birth order X PDD X DDD, were tested in an additional step, but were not significant, and so they are omitted from this table.