Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Health Econ. 2014 Aug 12;24(11):1422–1436. doi: 10.1002/hec.3095

Table III.

Robustness checks on difference-in-difference estimates

DID estimate Total volume Services of specific category (% of total volume)

Diagnosis Examination Radiology Therapy Surgery Drug







(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
A. DID, hospital FEs 132.9*** (31.3) −0.01631*** (0.00408) −0.00406 (0.00422) 0.00521** (0.00249) 0.01217 (0.01477) −0.02528*** (0.00837) 0.01113* (0.00635)
B. DID, county FEs 237.8*** (37.25) −0.000299 (0.00280) 0.0230*** (0.00352) 0.0161*** (0.00226) −0.0893*** (0.0118) −0.0227*** (0.00874) 0.0363*** (0.00497)
C. CEM+ DID 190.5*** (43.9) −0.01841*** (0.00435) 0.00793 (0.00618) 0.00945** (0.00368) −0.00019 (0.01760) −0.03160** (0.01319) 0.02800*** (0.00791)

Robust standard errors clustered by hospital in parentheses except for (B). Total volume in millions of points. A. Controlled for hospital fixed effects, accreditation level, ownership, and teaching status of hospitals and region.

B. Controlled for county fixed effects, accreditation level, ownership, and teaching status of hospitals and region; robust standard errors clustered by county in parentheses.

C. Hospitals matched using CEM (Iacus et al., 2011) on accreditation level, ownership, and teaching status of hospitals and region.

Significance levels:

*

p<0.10;

**

p<0.05;

***

p<0.01.