Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Crit Care. 2017 May;26(3):184–192. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017798

Table 7.

Significant indirect effects on posttraumatic stress disorder through influence on leadership subscale of resiliencea

Leadership CH YP GC1 GC2 GC3 DE1 DE2
Estimate, β (SE) 0.06 (0.03) −0.02 (0.05) −0.004 (0.04) −0.06 (0.05) 0.006 (0.03) 0.04 (0.03) 0.12(0.03)b
Odds ratio (95% CI) NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.82(0.50–1.1)
a

Abbreviations: CH, children; YP, years practicing; GC1, generation X compared with boomers II; GC2, millennial compared with boomers II; GC3, postwar or boomers I compared with boomers II; DEI, associate degree in nursing or diploma compared with bachelor of science degree in nursing (BSN); DE2, master’s degree or higher compared with BSN; NA, not applicable.

b

In 2-tailed test, P≤.05.