Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2017 Sep 22;30(12):10.1002/nbm.3800. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3800

Table 1.

Fitted GSH and Lac integrals for all five subjects and all three overlapping subjects for both the sMEGA and DEW methods as well as separate MEGA-PRESS acquisitions of the same metabolites. Both methods maintain a high GSH and Lac editing efficiency, comparable to that of conventional MEGA-PRESS acquisitions.

All subjects
Metabolite MEGA-PRESS DEW sMEGA
GSH 2.23 ± .51 2.31 ± .38 2.38 ± .53
Lac 1.72 ± .67 1.55 ± .35 1.53 ± .54
Overlapping subjects
GSH
Subject MEGA-PRESS DEW sMEGA
1 2.66 2.67 2.30
23 1.442.59 1.922.64 1.522.78
Lac
Subject MEGA-PRESS DEW sMEGA

1 1.86 1.27 0.75
23 2.610.75 1.701.28 1.501.37