Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 16;10(4):411–424. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9432-5

Table 1.

Success of nonoperative treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability

Study Level of evidence No. of patients Age Treatment/intervention Recurrence rate/outcomes Length of follow-up
Henry and Genung, Am J Sports Med, 1982 IV 120 young athletes 19 years 62 immobilized with shoulder immobilizer and sling and swath 3–6 weeks; 59 with no immobilization 90% recurrence in immobilized patients, 85% recurrence when not immobilized 18 months
Simonet et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984 IV 116/124 (93.5% follow-up) N/A Nonoperative 33% overall; 82% in young athletes (< 20 years) 4.6 years
Wheeler et al., Arthroscopy, 1989 II 47 Military cadets Arthroscopic repair (9) vs. nonoperative (38) treatment Nonoperative, 92% recurrence
Operative, 22% recurrence
14 months
Arciero et al., Am J Sports Med, 1994 I 36 Avg 20 years Arthroscopic repair and rehabilitation (21); nonoperative, 1 month immobilization, and rehabilitation, full activity at 4 months (15) Nonoperative, 80% recurrence
Operative, 14% recurrence
Avg 32 months
Bottoni et al., Am J Sports Med, 2002 I 21/24 (87.5% follow-up) Avg 22.4 years Nonoperative: 4 weeks of immobilization followed by rehab
Operative: arthroscopic Bankart repair followed by the same rehab
Nonoperative, 75% recurrence
Operative, 11.1% recurrence
3 years
Brophy and Marx, Arthroscopy, 2009 IV (systematic review) All studies comparing operative vs. nonoperative treatment N/A Nonoperative vs. operative stabilization Nonoperative, 46% recurrence
Operative, 7% recurrence
2 years
Kirkley et al., Arthroscopy, 2005 [33] II 31 Avg 23 years (all patients < 30 years) Nonoperative: immobilization (3 weeks) and rehabilitation
Operative: arthroscopic stabilization
Nonoperative, 60%; operative, 19%
No significant difference in shoulder function by ASES/DASH
Minimal significant improvement with WOSI in the operative group
75 months
Robinson et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006 III 252 15–35 years Sling followed by physical therapy 55.7% had recurrence in first 2 years, and 66.8% by 5 years 5 years
Jakobsen et al., Arthroscopy, 2007 I 76 15–39 years Conservative: diagnostic arthroscopy and 1-week sling, followed by therapy
Operative: open Bankart repair
At 2 years, 54% recurrence in the conservative group, 3% in the operative group
At 10 years, 74% unsatisfactory results in conservative, 72% good or excellent results in the operative group
10 years
Spiegl et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2013 [34] IV 25 with bony Bankart lesions 12 nonop, 13 op Operative if bony Bankart ≥ 5%
Nonoperative if bony Bankart < 5%
Nonoperative: good/excellent Rowe score in 83% with 25% subjective instability
Operative: good to excellent Rowe score in 85% with 8% subjective instability
2 years
Dickens et al., Am J Sports Med, 2014 II 45, in-season collegiate athletes Avg 20.7 years Accelerated rehabilitation without immobilization 73% return to sport all or some of the season; 67% completed season; 27% completed without recurrence; 64% returned to play but had recurrence Single season
Gigis et al., JPO, 2014 [35] II 65 (38 operative and 27 conservative) 15–18 years Nonoperative: immobilization and rehabilitation
Operative: arthroscopic stabilization
Nonoperative, 70.3% recurrence
Operative, 13.1% recurrence
36 months
Kawasaki et al., J Shoulder Elb Surg, 2014 III 378; in-season high school rugby players 14–18 years Nonoperative 14.8% incidence of dislocation with recurrence rate of 54.3% Single season
Khan et al., Bone Joint J, 2014 [36] IV 49/80 (61.3% follow-up) Skeletally immature patients Conservative treatment vs. Latarjet procedure 92% operative returned to same level
of activity vs. 52% for nonoperative
N/A
Konigshausen, Musculoskelet Surg, 2014 [37] III 26/28 (93% follow-up) 29.3 years Immobilized in external rotation 15% recurrence rate 5 years
Leroux et al., Am J Sports Med, 2014 [38] II 20,719 17–69 years (avg 35 years) All-comers receiving closed reduction of an anterior shoulder dislocation 19% incidence of repeat closed reduction
Highest in ≤ 20 years
Reduction by orthopedist, humeral tuberosity fracture, older age, and more medical comorbidities are protective.
Males and low-income areas are risk factors
2 years
Liu et al., Injury, 2014 [39] I, meta-analysis 663 N/A 338 external immobilization vs. 325 internal immobilization No difference in recurrence rates between the two types of immobilization N/A
Longo, Arthroscopy, 2014 [40] IV, systematic review 2813 N/A Compared recurrence in nonoperative vs. operative patients Recurrence is lower with operative treatment (OR 12.71; 95% CI 5.88–33.1; p < 0.00001) N/A
Olds et al., Br J Sports Med, 2015 IV, meta-analysis 1324 > 18 years with primary anterior shoulder dislocation Nonoperative 39% recurrence rate
Risk factors are < 40 years, men, and hyperlaxity
Protective factors are greater tuberosity fracture
N/A
Riccio et al., Musculoskelet Surg, 2015 IV 32 20–44 3-month conservative treatment protocol Rowe score for instability improved from 44.5 to 79.8; 78% of patients with good to excellent results with nonoperative treatment 2 years
Roberts et al., Bone Joint J, 2015 III 133 16.3 years (13–18) Nonoperative 76.7% recurrence at mean of 10 months 95.2 months
Leroux et al., Am J Sports Med, 2015 II 1937 10–16 years (avg 15 years) All-comers receiving closed reduction of an anterior shoulder dislocation 38.2% incidence of repeat closed reduction
Higher in 14–16 years old
Male sex and older age are risk factors for recurrence
Min of 2 years
Hovelius et al., KSSTA, 2016 [41] III 257 12–40 years Half of patients immobilized 3–4 weeks and half started with early motion Recurrence increased up to 10-year follow-up
After 25 years, 29% of shoulders with ≥ 2 recurrences stabilized over time.
34% moderate to severe and 27% mild arthropathy at 25 years
Age < 25 years and bilateral instability equal to poor prognosis while greater tuberosity fracture equals to a favorable prognosis
25 years
Olds et al., Br J Sports Med, 2016 [42] IV, meta-analysis N/A < 19 years with primary anterior shoulder dislocation Nonoperative 73% recurrence
Risk factors: older age, male sex, shoulder dominance and injury side, mechanism of injury, state of physis closure, and Hill–Sachs and Bankart lesions
N/A
Wasserstein et al., Arthroscopy, 2016 II, systematic review N/A N/A Nonoperative 19–88% recurrence rate with nonoperative treatment
Male sex and age < 20 years are risk factors.
Greater tuberosity fracture is protective
2 years
Watson et al., Sports Health, 2016 IV, systematic review N/A N/A In-season athlete return to play considerations 37–90% Single season
Whalen et al., Am J Sports Med, 2016 [57] I, meta-analysis 632 30.1 years in ER vs. 30.3 in IR External vs. internal immobilization No difference in recurrence (RR 0.69, 95% CI, 0.042–1.14, p = 0.15) N/A