Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s40658-017-0195-2

Table 4.

Including outliers, average LV volumes and LVEF calculated from PET using surface- (s), count- (c), and volume-based (v) methods compared with average values from MRI

PET, V B MRI Relative difference (%), V B p, V B
ESVs, mL 96 ± 36 90 ± 29 8.5 ± 29.8 0.347
EDVs, mL 206 ± 60 243 ± 65 − 14.4 ± 18.4 0.012
SVs, mL 110 ± 27 154 ± 42 − 26.7 ± 15.1 < 0.001
LVEFs, % 55 ± 6 63 ± 6 − 13.8 ± 8.7 < 0.001
ESVv, mL 87 ± 36 90 ± 29 − 2.7 ± 26.8 0.622
EDVv, mL 250 ± 69 244 ± 65 4.0 ± 21.6 0.652
SVv, mL 163 ± 41 154 ± 42 8.1 ± 23.5 0.372
LVEFv, % 66 ± 8 63 ± 6 4.2 ± 9.4 0.10
LVEFc, % 75 ± 8 63 ± 6 17.8 ± 10 < 0.001
PET, FP MRI Relative difference (%), FP p, FP
ESVs, mL 100 ± 38 90 ± 29 11.2 ± 19.5 0.041
EDVs, mL 192 ± 59 243 ± 65 − 21.2 ± 12.7 < 0.001
SVs, mL 93 ± 28 154 ± 42 − 39.2 ± 13.6 < 0.001
LVEFs, % 49 ± 7 63 ± 6 − 23.0 ± 8.9 < 0.001
ESVv, mL 99 ± 43 90 ± 29 9.2 ± 22.5 0.126
EDVv, mL 235 ± 68 244 ± 65 − 3.5 ± 14.7 0.320
SVv, mL 136 ± 40 154 ± 42 − 10.9 ± 19.8 0.031
LVEFv, % 59 ± 9 63 ± 6 − 7.8 ± 11.4 0.017
LVEFc, % 69 ± 10 63 ± 6 8.6 ± 11.5 0.008