Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 10;8:1918. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01918

Table 1.

Ring count and corresponding radiocarbon date range (±1σ).

Radius Sample Ring no. Range expected 14C Cal. date Likely range
number (from bark) from ring count measured (± 1σ) (year CE)
A A1 77 1920–1930 1668 (12.7%) 1682 1936–1952
1736 (19.3%) 1759
1760 (19.0%) 1781
1797 (6.1%) 1805
1936 (9.9%) 1947
1951 (1.2%) 1952
A2 26–29 1970–1980 1962 (11.3%) 1962 1962–1976
1962 (11.3%) 1962
1974 (24.9%) 1975
1975 (32.0%) 1976
A3 1 2000–2009 2002 (68.2%) 2004 2002–2004
B B1 60 1940–1950 1698 (19.8%) 1722 1879–1916
1816 (13.9%) 1834
1879 (34.3%) 1916
1954 (0.2%) 1955
B2 36 1960–1970 1699 (2.6%) 1703 1954–1955
1706 (12.1%) 1720
1818 (11.4%) 1833
1880 (41.3%) 1915
1954 (0.7%) 1955
B3 1 2000–2009 1957 (2.6%) 1957 2003–2005
2003 (5.6%) 2003
2003 (59.9%) 2005
C C1 1700 (0.7%) 1701 1881–1915
1707 (12.0%) 1719
1819 (2.5%) 1823
1825 (6.6%) 1833
1881 (45.7%) 1915
1954 (0.7%) 1955
C2 1892 (64.7%) 1907 1954-1955
1954 (3.5%) 1955
C3 1 2002 (65.2%) 2004 2002–2004
2004 (3.0%) 2004

For radius C, the ages are estimated based on the chronological order of the samples. Bold values indicate the most likely dates for samples from among the possible calibrated radiocarbon dates presented in column 5, taking into consideration the putative ring count.