Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;7:15545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15558-4

Table 1.

Demographics and resistance profiles of clinical isolates utilized in the study.

Patient No. Isolate No. Sex (M/F) Age (years) Weight (kg) BMI (kgm^2) FEV1 Pred Bacteria Resistance Profiles
1 1 F 57 60.6 22.5 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa NR
2 2 M 24 72 25.3 50 Staphylococcus aureus Clindamycin, Erythromycin R
3 3 M 50 57 19.3 43 Achromobacter xylosoxidans Gentamicin, Meropenem, Tobramycin R; Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin I
4 4A F 35 62 22.4 87 Staphylococcus aureus NR
4B Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc) NR
4C Pseudomonas aeruginosa Tobramycin, Gentamicin R
5 5 F 44 59 22 73 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc) Amikacin, Gentamicin, Meropenem, Ciprofloxacin, Tobramycin R
6 6 F 40 57 20.9 52 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc) Gentamicin, Tobramycin R
7 7 M 37 52.5 19.3 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc) NR
8 8 M 27 62 18.7 48 Staphylococcus aureus Clindamycin, Erythromycin, Cloxacillin R
9 9A F 31 40.5 18.2 55 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (muc) NR
9B Pseudomonas aeruginosa Meropenem R; Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin I