Table 1.
Source Study | Year | Case Date Range | Study Design | Sample Size | Region | Characteristics of imaging units | Demographic data | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRI | CT | ||||||||||||
Interval CT/MRI (days) | Field strength | Image Unit Manufacturer | Detector rows | Attenuation threshold (HU) | Men | Age (years) | Age range (years) | ||||||
Adams et al. | 2017 | 01/2014–10/2016 | retrospective | 346 | Germany | <90 | 1.5 | Siemens | 64, 320 | 130 | 173 | 58.7 | 18–95 |
Bai et al. | 2013 | 06/ 2011–09/2012 | prospective | 76 | China | N/A | 3 | Siemens | 16 | 100 | 76 | 69.5 | 49–91 |
Barbosa et al. | 2015 | N/A | retrospective | 6 | Brazil | 90 (1 with 300) | 3 | Philips | 16 | N/A | 4 | N/A | 41–54 |
Berberat et al. | 2014 | N/A | retrospective | 11 | Switzerland | N/A | 1.5 | Siemens | 320 | N/A | 58.9 | 39–74 | |
Chen et al. | 2014 | 03/2010–08/2010 | prospective | 38 | China | 0.5–5 | 3 | GE Healthcare | 16 | 100 | 24 | 33 | 6–75 |
Dou et al. | 2016 | 06/2011–10/2014 | prospective | 156 | China | N/A | 3 | N/A | 16 | 100 | 156 | 67.2 | 56–83 |
Gronemeyer et al. | 1992 | N/A | unclear | 19 | USA | N/A | 1, 1.5 | Siemens | N/A | 200 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Saini et al. | 2009 | 2006–2009 | retrospective | 137 | India | N/A | 1.5 | Siemens | N/A | N/A | 16 | 22.6 | 5–32 |
Yamada et al. | 1996 | N/A | prospective | 49 | Japan | 30 | 1.5 | Siemens | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Yang et al. | 2009 | N/A | prospective | 18 | China | N/A | 3 | Siemens | 64 | 130 | 11 | 65 | 39–79 |
Zhu et al. | 2008 | 09/2007–12/2007 | prospective | 35 | China | <1 | 1.5 | GE Healthcare | 16 | 90 | 19 | 39 | 09–65 |
Zulfiqar et al. | 2012 | 2001–2010 | retrospective | 71 | USA | N/A | 1.5, 3 | GE, Philips, Siemens | N/A | 33 | 42.5 | 14.5–78.5 |
Note. – N/A = data not available.