Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;7:15563. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15488-1

Table 4.

Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) Values.

Author Year Number of implants per group BIC BA Biomechanical test
control test control test control test
Offermanns et al.# 2016 15 65.2 ± 10.4 78.2 ± 9.6* 23.8 ± 4.2 44.6 ± 9.4* NR
Zhang et al. 2016 6 49.6 ± 6.5 58.7 ± 7.1** 29.5 ± 8.6 60.8 ± 10.3** NR
Fan et al. 2016 8 64 ± 5.9 77.1 ± 7.0* 6.3 ± 6.5 0.8 ± 1.7 ★41.1 ± 8.2 ★56.8 ± 18.6*
Dang et al. 2016 8 59.5 ± 3.2 63.2 ± 0.1* NR 10.8 ± 1.2 24.6 ± 2.4**
Tao et al. 2016a 10 17.2 ± 2.0 37.1 ± 2.3* 18.3 ± 0.9 33.7 ± 2.1* 121.2 ± 11.4 168.9 ± 22.2*
Tao et al. 2016b 10 34.6 ± 0.7 62.5 ± 3.0* 31.3 ± 0.8 47.32 ± 2.3* 126.3 ± 12.3 219.5 ± 21.8*
Zhang et al. 2015 6 51 ± 6.6 58.6 ± 2.9* 28.6 ± 6.2 44.5 ± 9.7* NR
Li et al. 2015 10 39.7 ± 6.0 46.1 ± 5.5* NR 108.9 ± 46.5 136.9 ± 21.7*
Offermanns et al.# 2015 12 27.8 ± 1.7 45.6 ± 2.2** 17.8 ± 2.2 24.4 ± 7.8* NR
Andersen et al.# 2013 5 0 ± 1.2 18 ± 14.3** 0 ± 5.1 22 ± 7.3* NR
Zhang et al. 2013 6 37 ± 8.7 51.2 ± 9.1* 40.6 ± 5.7 55.2 ± 9.8* 229.08 ± 59.0 388.84 ± 100.5**
Park et al. 2012 10 75.4 ± 5.4 84.6 ± 5.1** 57.3 ± 9.4 60.9 ± 10 NR
Yan et al.# 2012 12 58.8 ± 4.7 65.1 ± 4.9* NR 119.23 ± 3.9 142.31 ± 9.6*
M. Ballo et al. 2012 10 26.4 ± 10.7 35.7 ± 12.9* 25.7 ± 2.9 32.9 ± 9.3* NR
FU et al. 2012 10 72.2 ± 12.8 87.7 ± 2.8* 9.3 ± 0.5 9.8 ± 1.5 NR
Park et al. 2010 7 47.3 ± 10.4 60.1 ± 10.2* 46.7 ± 10.7 46.6 ± 6.5 ★1.6 ± 0.9 ★2.6 ± 1.2*
Li et al. 2010 10 42.5 ± 4.1 63 ± 6.7* 25.2 ± 2.2 42.73 ± 4.3* 38.7 ± 5.3 80.2 ± 9.9**

Values are shown as mean ± SD; #values are presented as median value ± interquartile range;

BIC, BA values in %; pull-out test values in N; ★removal torque testing values in Ncm;

*p Value < 0.05; **p Value < 0.01; NR: not reported.