Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;118(5):2935–2943. doi: 10.1152/jn.00211.2017

Table 1.

Summary of lifting performance variables in action test across all subjects

FGF, N dLF, N Tcom, N·mm Peak Roll, deg Peak Object Velocity, cm/s
Group 1
dy = 0 mm
    Active 12.2 ± 1.2 –5.0 ± 0.2 –227.7 ± 4.5 2.0 ± 0.3 10.4 ± 1.0
    Passive 13.3 ± 1.4 –5.0 ± 0.3 –225.8 ± 3.0 1.5 ± 0.3 9.3 ± 0.9
dy = –10 mm
    Active 11.3 ± 1.2 –2.6 ± 0.3 –222.7 ± 4.1 1.6 ± 0.2 10.1 ± 0.9
    Passive 12.2 ± 1.3 –2.1 ± 0.3 –223.2 ± 3.2 1.3 ± 0.2 9.6 ± 1.0
dy = –20 mm
    Active 10.4 ± 1.1 –0.1 ± 0.5 –219.9 ± 5.7 1.8 ± 0.2 10.0 ± 0.9
    Passive 11.1 ± 1.2 0.4 ± 0.5 –225.0 ± 4.0 1.3 ± 0.3 9.6 ± 1.2
Group 2
dy = –3 mm
    Active 14.1 ± 2.4 –4.1 ± 0.5 –244.2 ± 9.1 2.6 ± 0.4 20.8 ± 2.7
    Passive 15.5 ± 2.1 –3.8 ± 0.5 –242.4 ± 5.2 1.7 ± 0.3 21.3 ± 3.4
dy = –6 mm
    Active 13.9 ± 2.5 –3.7 ± 0.4 –236.5 ± 9.4 2.2 ± 0.3 20.1 ± 2.4
    Passive 13.7 ± 2.4 –3.2 ± 0.4 –242.9 ± 3.6 1.5 ± 0.3 20.9 ± 3.4

Data are means ± SE of average grip force (FGF), load force difference (dLF), compensatory torque (Tcom), peak roll of object, and peak object velocity per vertical distance between digit center of pressure (dy) averaged across all subjects for the active and passive conditions.