Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;137(12):1667–1675. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2787-7

Table 2.

Peri-operative imaging and intra-operative corrections

No-3D
n (%)
3D
n (%)
Risk difference
% [95% CI]
Risk ratio
[95% CI]
Preoperative imaging 0.6 [−0.9 to 2.1] 1.0 [0.8 to 1.2]
 X-ray 1 (1) 1 (1) 0.1 [−2.4 to 2.6] 1.1 [0.1 to 17.8]
 CT scan 45 (39) 47 (45) 6.7 [−6.2 to 19.7] 1.2 [0.9 to 1.6]
 X-ray & CT scan 71 (61) 55 (53) −7.8 [−20.9 to 5.3] 0.9 [0.7 to 1.1]
 Other 0 (0) 1 (1) 1.0 [−0.9 to 2.8]
Type of preoperative X-ray
 AP & lateral 92 (99) 85 (97) −2.3 [−6.7 to 2.0] 1.0 [0.9 to 1.0]
 Axial 55 (53) 50 (52) −0.8 [−14.7 to 13.0] 1.0 [0.8 to 1.3]
 Broden 35 (34) 19 (20) 13.9 [25.9 to1.8] 0.6 [0.4 to 1.0]
 Overall corrections performed 61 (53) 70 (69) 16.3 [3.5 to 29.1] 1.3 [1.1 to 1.6]
 Corrections performed after 2D-imaging 61 (53) 38 (38) 15.4 [28.6 to2.3] 0.7 [0.5 to 1.0]
Number of corrections after 2D-imaging −3.4 [−6.6 to −0.3] 1.0 [0.8 to 1.2]
 0 54 (47) 63 (62) 15.4 [2.3 to 28.55] 1.3 [1.0 to 1.7]
 1 39 (34) 29 (29) −5.2 [−17.6 to 7.2] 0.8 [0.6 to 1.3]
 2 17 (15) 9 (9) −5.9 [−14.4 to 2.7] 0.6 [0.3 to 1.3]
 3 5 (4) 0 (0) −4.3 [−8.1 to −0.6]
Type of correction after 2D-imaging −3.5 [−21.0 to 14.0] 0.9 [0.7 to 1.3]
 Reduction 39 (43) 22 (47)
 Implant position 51 (57) 25 (53)
Year 3D-imaging performed 54.0 [43.6–64.5] 5.0 [2.9–8.7]
 Before 2007 78 (87) 12 (13)
 After 2007 46 (33) 95 (67)
Number of 3D scans
 1 90 (84)
 2 16 (15)
 3 1 (1)
Number of corrections after
3D-imaging
 0 48 (47)
 1 36 (35)
 2 13 (13)
 3 4 (4)
 4 0 (0)
 5 1 (1)
Timing 3D scan
Before reduction &
hardware implantation
0 (0)
After reduction 12 (10)
After reduction &
hardware implantation
113 (90)
Type of correction after 3D-imaging
Reduction 2 (4)
Implant position 51 (96)
Postoperative imaging
 X-ray 118 (98) 102 (95) −2.2 [−7.1 to 2.7] 1.0 [0.9 to 1.0]
 CT scan 0 (0) 0 (0)
 X-ray & CT scan 3 (3) 5 (5) 2.2 [−2.7 to 7.0] 1.9 [0.5 to 7.7]
 Other 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Type of postoperative X-ray
  AP & lateral 118 (100) 107 (100)
  Axial 89 (75) 86 (80) 5.0 [−5.9 to 15.8] 1.1 [0.9 to 1.2]
  Broden 37 (31) 37 (35) 3.2 [−9.1 to 15.5] 1.1 [0.8 to 1.6]

Bold values indicate a significant difference between the groups

CI confidence interval