Table 1. A comparison of AO-SLO with FAF, FFA, ICGA and OCT.
Methods | Invasive | aTransverse resolution | 1,aField angle | First time available | Applications |
AO-SLO | 2N | 2.5 µm | 1.5° | 2002[12] | Observing cones, rods, vessel and capillary, nerve fiber layer etc (Table 2). |
FAF | N | 20 µm | 50° | 31970s[13] | Retinal pseudodrusen, macular edema, choroidal neovascularis[14] choroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy[15] etc. |
FFA | Y | 20 µm | 50° | 1960[16] | Fundus neovascularization, aneurysms, tumor, telangiectasis, edema, vitreous inflammation[14] etc. |
ICGA | Y | 20 µm | 50° | 1970 in eye[17] | Choroidal vasculopathy, exudative AMD, inflammation and tumors, central serous chorioretinopathy[15] etc. |
OCT | N | 420 µm | 45° | 1991[18] | 5Vitreoretinal interface disorders, central serous chorioretinopathy, AMD, diabetic retinopathy[15] etc. |
1Pupil diameter at about 6 mm; 2AO-SLO fluorescein angiography not included; 3Fundus autofluorescence was reported around 1870s[19], but it was not explored for clinical use until 1970s; 4Axial resolution is about 5 µm; 5AO-OCT and angio-OCT not included; aThe approximate data.