Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 18;10(11):1751–1758. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.11.18

Table 1. A comparison of AO-SLO with FAF, FFA, ICGA and OCT.

Methods Invasive aTransverse resolution 1,aField angle First time available Applications
AO-SLO 2N 2.5 µm 1.5° 2002[12] Observing cones, rods, vessel and capillary, nerve fiber layer etc (Table 2).
FAF N 20 µm 50° 31970s[13] Retinal pseudodrusen, macular edema, choroidal neovascularis[14] choroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy[15] etc.
FFA Y 20 µm 50° 1960[16] Fundus neovascularization, aneurysms, tumor, telangiectasis, edema, vitreous inflammation[14] etc.
ICGA Y 20 µm 50° 1970 in eye[17] Choroidal vasculopathy, exudative AMD, inflammation and tumors, central serous chorioretinopathy[15] etc.
OCT N 420 µm 45° 1991[18] 5Vitreoretinal interface disorders, central serous chorioretinopathy, AMD, diabetic retinopathy[15] etc.

1Pupil diameter at about 6 mm; 2AO-SLO fluorescein angiography not included; 3Fundus autofluorescence was reported around 1870s[19], but it was not explored for clinical use until 1970s; 4Axial resolution is about 5 µm; 5AO-OCT and angio-OCT not included; aThe approximate data.