Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;1(3):221–230. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00038

Table 2.

Comparison Between CAB-Sensitive and CAB-Resistant Patients

Characteristic Sensitive (n = 135) Resistant (n = 44) Pa
Sex ratio, F/M 62/73 21/23 0.49
Age at diagnosis, y 38.2 ± 16.6 29.7 ± 13.6 0.13
34.5 (10.6–79.0) 26.5 (13.3–68.6)
PRL level at diagnosis, ng/mL 1292 ± 2182 3174 ± 4972 <1.10−2
534 (25–16,000) 1100 (130–22,700)
Maximal tumor diameter at diagnosis, mm 22.0 ± 10.3 30.7 ± 21.0 0.02
20.2 (10.0–55.0) 23.0 (10.0–110.0)
Impaired vision 31 (23.0) 12 (27.3) 0.42
Invasion in cavernous sinus 46 (34.1) 21 (47.7) 0.44
Gonadotropic deficiency only 43 (31.9) 12 (27.3) <1.10−2
AIP mutation 14 (10.4) 6 (13.6) 0.92
MEN1 mutation 2 (1.5) 3 (6.8) 0.24
Initial dose of CAB, mg/wk 0.73 ± 0.30 1.36 ± 0.86 <1.10−4
0.50 (0.13–2.00) 1.00 (0.50–3.50)
CAB dose at time of PRL normalization, mg/wk 0.97 ± 0.50 3.81 ± 1.28 <1.10−4
1.00 (0.25–3.00) 3.50 (2.50–8.00)
Duration of CAB treatment, y 5.8 ± 4.6 8.9 ± 4.7 <1.10−4
5.1 (0.1–25.4) 9.0 (1.0–18.6)
Duration of follow-up, y 9.6 ± 8.3 13.2 ± 8.3 <1.10−2
6.3 (0.0–37.3) 11.9 (1.2–35.0)
Time between CAB initiation and PRL normalization, y 1.5 ± 2.3 5.5 ± 4.1 <1.10−4
0.6 (0.0–14.3) 4.3 (0.7–12.4)
Bromocriptine treatment 41 (30.4) 18 (40.9) 0.20
Quinagolide treatment 22 (16.3) 16 (36.4) <1.10−2
Surgery 16 (11.9) 15 (34.1) <1.10−2
Radiotherapy 3 (2.2) 6 (13.6) 0.37

Values are given as mean ± standard deviation, median, and range, or as numbers and percentages.

a

Statistical significance of comparison between males and females. Statistically significant differences are indicated in bold.