Table 1.
Patient demographics
| NO. | FU (M) | Side | Symptom Duration (M) | Bony Erosions (mm) | Talar Lesion Management | Additional Surgery | Patient Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | R | 18 | Talus: 10*13*8, 12*10*9, Distal Tibia: 5*5*7 | OATS (Ø10mm, 2 plugs) | – | Good |
| 2 | 26 | R | 24 | Talus: 10*9*7, Distal Tibia: 11*8*10, Distal fibular: 8*12*8 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Good |
| 3 | 27 | L | 15 | Talus: 7*6*6 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Fair |
| 4 | 43 | R | 12 | Talus: 10*10*8, Distal Tibia: 4*4*3 | OATS (Ø10mm,2 plugs) | Syndesmosis screw fixaion | Fair |
| 5 | 25 | L | 10 | Talus: 6*5*7 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Excellent |
| 6 | 44 | R | 16 | Talus: 9*6*8 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Good |
| 7 | 30 | R | 15 | Talus: 7*5*5 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | – | Good |
| 8 | 45 | L | 12 | Talus: 5*9*7, Distal Tibia: 5*6*5 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | – | Fair |
| 9 | 37 | L | 10 | Talus: 8*8*5 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Bad |
| 10 | 50 | R | 6 | Talus: 14*9*11 | OATS (Ø10mm, 2 plugs) | – | Bad |
| 11 | 42 | R | 30 | Talus: 6*7*8, Distal Tibia: 6*5*4 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | – | Excellent |
| 12 | 31 | R | 24 | Talus: 10*11*9, Subtalar joint | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Fair |
| 13 | 49 | L | 12 | Talus: 14*9*10 | OATS (Ø10mm, 2 plugs) | – | Excellent |
| 14 | 34 | R | 18 | Talus: 9*8*8 | Bone grafting (allogenic cancellous bone) | Modified Brostrom | Good |
| 15 | 40 | L | 15 | Talus: 14*12*7 | OATS (Ø10mm, 2 plugs) | – | Fair |