Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;17:377. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1556-5

Table 2.

Neonatal outcomes in occiput posterior and anterior births and the risk difference between the groups

Outcome ALL N = 27,648 Occiput posterior N = 1292 Occiput anterior N = 26,356 Risk difference
n (%) n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI 95% CI
Umbilical artery pH
 < 7.00 88 (0.4) 5 (0.5) 0.21–1.14 83 (0.4) 0.34–0.53 0.06 (−0.26–0.78)
 < 7.05 278 (1.4) 16 (1.6) 0.96–2.53 262 (1.3) 1.19–1.52 0.22 (−0.44–1.25)
 < 7.10 789 (3.9) 56 (5.5) 4.24–7.04 733 (3.8) 3.51–4.05 1.71 (0.40–3.35)
Metabolic acidaemiaa 35 (0.2) 2 (0.2) 0.05–0.72 33 (0.2) 0.12–0.24 0.03 (−0.15–0.62)
Apgar < 7 at 5 min 208 (0.8) 20 (1.5) 1.00–2.38 188 (0.7) 0.62–0.83 0.83 (0.25–1.71)
Neonatal care 458 (1.7) 38 (2.9) 2.15–4.01 420 (1.6) 1.45–1.75 1.35 (0.51–2.47)
Composite morbidityb 567 (2.1) 47 (3.6) 2.75–4.80 520 (2.0) 1.81–2.15 1.66 (0.72–2.89)

Data are presented as n (%) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Calculations were only made on deliveries with complete registration of data

aMetabolic acidaemia: umbilical artery pH < 7.00 and base deficit ≥ 12 mmol/L

bComposite morbidity: any of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min; pH < 7.00; metabolic acidaemia or admission to neonatal care