Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2013 Oct 29;90(6):1201–1215. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12425

Table 2.

Proteins that were co-isolated with ComGG.

Peptide count Per cent sequence coverage


Proteina Wild typeb ΔcomGG O/E comGG Wild type ΔcomGG O/E comGG
ComGG 3 0 11 23% n.a. 57%
ComGA 11 3 15 33% 9.8% 42%
ComGB 2 0 4 7.1% n.a. 13%
ComGC 5 0 6 38% n.a. 39%
ComGD 0 0 4 n.a. n.a. 25%
ComGE 0 0 3 n.a. n.a. 28%
ComGF 4 0 7 43% n.a. 39%
ComFA 9 2 12 20% 2.6% 25%
ComEC 1 2 7 2.6% 5.9% 10%
ComC 0 0 3 n.a. n.a. 15%
NucA 0 0 2 n.a. n.a. 18%
RecA 6 1 15 21% 4.6% 54%
SsbB 6 0 8 64% n.a. 74%
DprA 7 0 10 28% n.a. 28%
Maf 0 0 3 n.a. n.a. 22%
YqfA (FloA) 8 1 21 31% 4.5% 74%
YuaG (FloT) 1 0 14 2.2% n.a. 33%
FtsH 12 5 21 21% 11% 36%
MntB 7 2 13 36% 6.4% 62%
a

Proteins indicated in boldface were reproducibly isolated in at least two out of three independent experiments. Representative data are displayed.

b

Wild type (BD2528), ΔcomGG∷Tet (BD5404), O/E comGG (BD5575). O/E: overexpressing. n.a. indicates ‘not applicable’.