Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Traffic. 2017 Apr 5;18(5):304–314. doi: 10.1111/tra.12478

TABLE 2.

Summary of kinesin protofilament (PF) switching in the absence and presence of Tau and rigor kinesin obstacles

Microtubule Obstacle # Trajectories (avg length, μm) Mean ± SD PF Switch Frequency (PF Switches / μm) Total # Left PF Switches Total # Right PF Switches Median Left PF Switch Displace-ment (nm) Median Right PF Switch Displace-ment (nm)

Kinesin-1 30 (1.5) 0.57 ± 0.74 18 18 30 32
Low Tau 33 (1.4) 0.59 ± 0.74 16 20 21 23
High Tau 31 (1.4) 0.74 ± 0.78 24 20 26 26
Low RK 36 (1.8) 0.57 ± 0.64 24 21 34 30
High RK 44 (1.8) 0.41 ± 0.60 21 22 28 33

Kinesin-2 31 (1.5) 2.20* ± 1.47 57 55 34 38
Low Tau 30 (1.3) 2.08* ± 1.44 46 44 35 31
High Tau 30 (1.6) 2.21* ± 1.28 53 52 40 38
Low RK 30 (2.2) 2.19* ± 0.89 74 72 38 39
High RK 32 (2.0) 2.48* ± 0.68 76 81 38 38

The mean (SD, standard deviation) protofilament (PF) switch frequency for each condition was calculated from a distribution made up of the PF switch frequencies of each trajectory. The median left/right protofilament switch displacement was calculated from a distribution made up of the left/right displacements for each experimental condition. A nonparametric ANOVA was applied to all distributions and a Dunn’s Multiple Comparisons Test was used to determine significance (p-value < 0.05) among groups.

*

Represents statistical difference from the kinesin-1 experimental condition.