Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 13;8(1):1380471. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1380471

Table 1.

Relationships between abilities assessed by PITQ-t, PITQ-p, and expert intervention targets.

Interventions that experts endorse using‘very often’ during at least one stage of treatmenta PITQ-t items assessing abilitytargeted by interventionb PITQ-p items assessing abilitytargeted by interventionc
Establishing safety 1, 2 12, 18, 19
Establishing/repairing alliance 5 2
Teaching/practicing grounding 8 7, 28
Educating about disorders/treatment 4 1
Diagnosing psychiatric illnesses * *
Teaching/practicing self-care 14 14
Developing healthy relationships 17 17
Affect tolerance and impulse control 11, 12 10, 11
Stabilizing from current stressors 6 4, 5
Teaching/practicing containment 7 6
Ego strengthening activities 3, 20 22, 24
Acceptance of DD diagnosis 4 1
Processing when and why dissociation occurs 15, 16 15, 16
Assess response to medications * *
CBT focused on cognitions 3, 9, 13, 20, 21, 24 3, 8, 13, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28
Awareness of emotion
 10 9
Processing patient’s reactions to therapy 5 2
Stabilizing following intrusions from alleged perpetrators 6 4, 5
Cooperation with/between parts 26, 27 29, 32
Teaching/discussing attachment ^ (17, 20, 21) ^ (17, 22, 23)
Identifying/working with parts 25 30
Discussing therapeutic relationship 5 2
Awareness of body sensation
 10 9
Exposure to traumatic memories/abreaction 18, 23 20, 26

a Interventions endorsed by at least 45% of experts; Brand et al. (2012).

b PITQ-t items 4–29 (see Table 5 for item content) are taken verbatim from PITQ items; PITQ-t items 1–3 rephrase the content of the remaining 3 PITQ items for clarity.

c See Table 7 for PITQ-p item content.

* Not a patient-targeted ability.

^ PITQ family of measures does not explicitly query, but is very closely related to (items in parentheses).