Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 15;7:15622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15617-w

Table 2.

Quantitative evaluation of inter-observer variability, intra-observer variability and method versus each observer independently (n = 5), reported as mean ± standard deviation. p-values were computed with a paired sample t-test between the inter-observer variability and proposed method for each evaluation measure. Indicates a significant difference (p-value < 0.05, i.e. less than 5% chance that the samples have identical averages).

Inter-observer (n = 5) Intra-observer (n = 5) Method vs. observer 1 (n = 5) Method vs. observer 2 (n = 5)
DSC 0.75 ± 0.06 0.88 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.02 0.84 ± 0.09
HD (mm) 17.98 ± 2.01 11.72 ± 2.03 20.34 ± 2.35 16.21 ± 3.80
MHD (mm) 0.61 ± 0.10 0.15 ± 0.03 0.76 ± 0.12 0.28 ± 0.11
95% HD (mm) 7.57 ± 3.07 0.86 ± 0.43 9.41 ± 2.22 5.59 ± 3.45
CMD (mm) 0.78 ± 0.14 0.20 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.13 0.35 ± 0.13
AVD (%) 44.49 ± 18.46 4.31 ± 3.50 14.49 ± 3.50 24.16 ± 26.66