Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 15;7:15622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15617-w

Table 3.

Quantitative evaluation of the segmentation results overall (n = 143) and per subvolume, reported as mean ± standard deviation. DSC is Dice similarity coefficient, HD is Hausdorff distance, MHD is modified HD, 95% HD is 95th percentile HD, CMD is contour mean distance and AVD is absolute volume difference.

Overall (n = 143) Subvolume 1 (n = 23) Subvolume 2 (n = 29) Subvolume 3 (n = 33) Subvolume 4 (n = 33) Subvolume 5 (n = 25)
DSC 0.91 ± 0.07 0.91 ± 0.06 0.91 ± 0.08 0.90 ± 0.08 0.92 ± 0.07 0.93 ± 0.07
HD (mm) 8.05 ± 3.46 8.74 ± 3.20 7.64 ± 2.82 7.20 ± 2.56 7.14 ± 2.81 10.20 ± 4.85
MHD (mm) 0.23 ± 0.22 0.30 ± 0.25 0.22 ± 0.21 0.26 ± 0.24 0.18 ± 0.16 0.20 ± 0.22
95% HD (mm) 1.32 ± 1.67 2.14 ± 2.06 1.33 ± 1.76 1.49 ± 1.73 0.93 ± 1.16 0.82 ± 1.27
CMD (mm) 0.26 ± 0.24 0.37 ± 0.30 0.23 ± 0.21 0.27 ± 0.24 0.20 ± 0.17 0.28 ± 0.27
AVD (%) 14.17 ± 18.90 11.51 ± 13.80 14.96 ± 22.26 19.48 ± 23.06 11.83 ± 13.53 11.76 ± 17.11
Sensitivity 0.938 0.931 0.946 0.941 0.897 0.966
Specificity 0.997 0.995 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.997
Accuracy 0.995 0.992 0.997 0.996 0.994 0.996