Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar 28;135(1):54–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.03.007

Table II.

Summary of reported analyses of heart failure clinical trial databases for gender related differences in survival.

Study Year Total Patients %F F/U Yrs. Overall Survival CV HF ICM DCM Population Hormone Status ref #
First Database 1999 471 23.8 1.5 F>M F>M NS F>M end-stage HF none 1
New Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy 2000 1230 40 4.4 F>M F>M New DCM only none 2
Charm Database 2007 7599 31.6 3.2 F>M F>M F>M F>M Systolic & Diastolic HF No difference HRT vs. No HRT 3
5 Pooled Trials 2007 11642 24.5 0.6–2.5 F>M F>M F>M F>M systolic HF none 4
Cleveland Clinic Scar & Survival 2009 339 24 4 M>F M>F M>F NA established CAD/MI only none 5
CV Health Study Database 2009 1264 51 3 F>M F>M ND 65 or over Diastolic & systolic HF 80% dead by 3 yrs none 6
Digitalis Trial Group Database 2009 3338 50 3.2 F>M F>M ND HF none 7
HF Clinic Database 2011 531 26 1 F>M ND outpatient, systolic & valve disease none 8

HF -heart failure; F -female; M -male; ND -not done; NA -Not applicable; DCM -dilated cardiomyopathy (not ischemic); ICM -ischemic cardiomyopathy; column on far right, numbers correlate with following references: 1. Adams et al., 1999; 2. Kong et al., 2004; 3. O’Meara et al., 2007; 4. Frazier et al., 2007; 5. Kwon, Halley, & Popovic, 2009; 6. Parashar et al., 2009; 7. Ahmed et al., 2011; 8. Feldman et al., 2011.