Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 7;17:725. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3704-8

Table 3.

Results of subgroup analyses on OS

Variables HR[95%CI] Number I2 Pd
Year > mediana
 Yes 3.65[2.49–5.36] 6 0.00% 0.578
 No 2.44[1.19–4.99] 7 72.90% 0.001
Country
 East Asia 3.39[2.27–5.05] 10 46.50% 0.051
 Non-East Asia 2.10[0.52–8.54] 3 74.50% 0.02
Marker
 Single 2.72[1.48–5.00] 9 66.80% 0.002
 Multiple 3.77[2.62–5.43] 4 0.00% 0.799
Sampling time point
 Pre-op 3.65[2.49–5.36] 6 0.00% 0.578
 Intra/post-op 2.44[1.19–4.99] 7 72.90% 0.001
Patient no. > medianb
 Yes 3.45[2.57–4.65] 6 0.00% 0.801
 No 2.59[1.08–6.22] 7 74.20% 0.001
Detection rate > meanc
 Yes 1.57[0.42–5.79] 4 74.10% 0.009
 No 3.71[2.84–4.85] 9 0.00% 0.796
Quality of study
 Low 4.06[1.64–10.05] 2 0.00% 0.384
 High 2.95[1.87–4.65] 11 61.50% 0.004
Overall 3.07[2.05–4.62] 13 55.70% 0.008

NOTE: aThe median year for OS was 2012

bThe median patient no. for OS was 103

cThe mean detection rate for OS was 38.12%

dTwo-tailed P value of tests for heterogeneity