Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 17;8(18):3764–3773. doi: 10.7150/jca.20900

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic parameters for survival in patients with GC

Prognostic parameter Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Expression of ITGBL1 (low vs. high) 2.728 (1.576-4.724) <0.001 2.094(1.184-3.703) 0.011
Age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60) 1.013 (0.998-1.028) 0.083 - -
Gender (male vs. female) 0.918 (0.649-1.299) 0.631 - -
Lauren type (intestinal vs. diffuse) 2.257 (1.625-3.134) <0.001 1.340 (0.850-2.112) 0.208
Tumor size (≤ 5 cm vs. > 5 cm) 3.665 (2.576-5.215) <0.001 1.314 0.796-2.168) 0.295
T classification (T1, 2 vs. T3, 4) 8.497 (4.703-15.353) <0.001 1.379 (0.395-4.819) 0.614
Lymph node metastasis (absent vs. present) 7.771 (4.737-12.750) <0.001 3.323 (0.916-12.056) 0.068
TNM stage (I - II vs. III - IV) 9.135 (5.879-14.193) <0.001 1.562 (0.371-6.575) 0.543
Early gastric cancer (no vs. yes) 14.973 (4.771-46.992) <0.001 4.491 (0.510-39.517) 0.176
Distant metastasis (absent vs. present) 9.667 (6.331-14.761) <0.001 5.229 (2.861-9.557) <0.001

aHR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval

bThe bold number represents the p value with significant differences