Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 16;11(11):e0006035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006035

Table 4. Model-set performance metrics: Model predictions vs. independent observations over three years (2014–2016).

Species Metric  Year*
2014 2015 2016 2014−2016
Rhodnius pictipes Pearson’s ρ 0.778 0.791 0.722 0.794
MBE −0.997 −2.213 −3.184 −2.131
MAE 2.912 3.997 4.740 3.747
Within ±5 bugs 122 (87.8%) 121 (87.1%) 120 (86.3%) 121 (87.1%)
Rhodnius robustus Pearson’s ρ 0.361 0.330 0.323 0.346
MBE 0.691 0.332 0.216 0.413
MAE 1.437 1.781 1.844 1.649
Within ±5 bugs 132 (95.0%) 131 (94.2%) 129 (92.8%) 131 (94.2%)
Rhodnius neglectus Pearson’s ρ 0.309 0.355 0.475 0.412
MBE 0.197 −0.436 −0.098 −0.095
MAE 2.315 2.611 2.357 2.169
Within ±5 bugs 125 (89.9%) 122 (87.8%) 126 (90.7%) 124 (89.2%)
Panstrongylus geniculatus Pearson’s ρ 0.346 0.463 0.432 0.464
MBE −0.428 −1.256 −1.385 −1.023
MAE 2.565 3.204 3.298 2.737
Within ±5 bugs 122 (87.8%) 124 (89.2%) 118 (84.9%) 123 (88.5%)

*Data for 2014–2016 became available after modeling was complete; the metrics in this Table compare the predictions of each species’ model set with the independent data for each year and with the (per-year) data of the three-year period (2014–2016). The performance metrics are: Pearson’s ρ, Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient; MBE, mean bias error; MAE, mean absolute error; ‘Within ±5 bugs’, number (and percent) of municipalities where model-based predictions and independent observations differed by ±5 house-invading bugs or less

See S1 Data and S2 Table for details