Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;18(3):16–27. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12061

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Percent dose differences between the sACE and TG‐43 dose calculations for a MCVC applicator having air in the surface grooves with the peripheral channels loaded (a), with the central channel loaded (b), and with the central channel loaded and the innermost margin increased from 10 mm to 20 mm (c). Percent dose differences between the hACE and TG‐43 dose calculations for the MCVC with the peripheral channels loaded (d) and with the central channel loaded (e). The surface grooves lie in the horizontal plane bisecting the applicator.