Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):170–177. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12025

Table 3.

Comparison of patient dose calculated by Mobius to AcurosXB for pre‐clinical test cases

Plan number Target mean dose percent difference (%) Target D95% percent difference (%) 3D global gamma pass rate (%) Target gamma pass rate (%)
1 1.4a −0.4a 94.4b 79.4b
2 1.7 0.6 98.5 95.3
3 2.6 2.4 94.4 62.2
4 1.3 −1.3 99.9 98.0
5 1.5 −0.2 94.0 75.7
6 1.1 −0.5 95.2 83.0
7 1.8 0.1 95.7 69.4
8 1.8 −0.1 97.3 69.4
9 2.1 0.1 96.3 64.7
10 2.5 1.1 92.0 58.5
11 −0.6 −2.8 97.4 92.9
12 −1.2 −4.4 87.9 80.7
13 0.6 −3.7 89.9 82.1
14 −0.6 −3.2 88.7 87.7
15 0.2 −0.8 96.1 98.6
16 −0.4 −3.9 92.9 79.9
17 1.6 1.2 94.3 85.4
a

A positive percent difference indicates that Mobius calculated dose is higher than AcurosXB.

b

3D global gamma pass rate and target gamma pass rate use gamma criteria of 3%, 2  mm.