Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 5;18(1):66–75. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12008

Table 4.

The comparison of normal liver dosimetric parameters in patients with RILD and without RILD among week1, week2, and week3

Parameter Refb Ptsa with RILD (n = 7) Pts without RILD (n = 16) P * [Link]
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week1 Week2 Week3 Week1 Week2 Week3
V20 c (%) NA 40.9 (32.6–44.1) 45.6 (36.1–48.9) 48.8 (40.0–51.9) 29.9 (19.7–36.6) 33.1 (22.9–41.2) 36.4 (25.5–44.3) 0.521 0.010 0.227
V30 (%) NA 29.7 (23.2–34.8) 33.8 (27.1–38.2) 36.5 (30.1–42.3) 21.9 (10.8–26.1) 24.7 (13.4–28.6) 28.2 (16.5–31.8) 0.111 0.008 0.503
V40 (%) NA 24.1 (16.6–28.3) 26.9 (21.3–31.2) 31.0 (24.2–35.9) 16.4 (7.5–21.5) 18.6 (9.6–22.2) 21.1 (11.6–24.2) 0.025 0.074 0.002
D50 d (Gy) 35 26.4 (22.3–31.5) 30.6 (27.3–33.1) 35.3 (31.8–38.1) 14.6 (4.5–24.8) 17.3 (6.7–25.4) 20.4 (8.1–30.2) 0.754 0.003 0.002
Dmean (Gy) 28 25.8 (23.5–27.3) 28.4 (24.9–32.3) 32.4 (28.6–36.1) 18.1 (6.7–25.3) 21.2 (8.4–27.6) 24.6 (11.3–31.4) 0.403 0.020 0.107
a

Pts = patients.

b

Ref = hepatic radiation tolerance.

c

V20 = percentage of the normal liver volume that received exceeding 20Gy in the total normal liver; V30, V40 express the resembling meaning, except for the suffix numbers, which represent the doses received in increments of 10 Gy.

d

D50 = dose to 50% of the normal liver.

*Significance in independent sample t‐test with P value less than 0.05 from two‐sided tests.