Table 2.
No. | Step | Potential failure modes | Potential causes of failure | Potential effects of failure | Machine | Notes and examples of causes and failures |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 | Frame cap/adapter test | Distorted frame adapter |
1. Lack of standardized procedures 2. Personnel omission |
Inconvenience (staff and patient) | Perfexion | The frame adapter for Perfexion is bad but not found out before a treatment. Treatment can not proceed. |
65 | Frame adapter attachment | Frame adapter not attached properly |
1. Inadequate training/orientation 2. Personnel omission |
Inconvenience Inaccurate dose delivery |
Perfexion | On the Perfexion, the frame adaptor should be attached properly. Failure to do so may result in an interruption in the treatment process or an imperfect dose delivery. Elekta has a field notice about this. |
59 | Chart finish‐up | Unnoticed plugged pattern |
1. Miscommunication 2. Lack of standard procedures. |
Very wrong dose Very wrong dose distribution Very wrong volume |
4C | A plug pattern is used on 4C but the hard copy does not show it, either because of an incorrect printout selection or a breakdown of the printer. Treatment proceeded without the plug pattern. |
72 | Final check | Wrong plug pattern |
1. Personnel omission 2. Lack of double check |
Wrong dose distribution | 4C | The plug pattern is not put in correctly on 4C. |
73 | Final check | Inserts/Plugs not secured |
1. Personnel omission 2. Lack of double check |
Interrupted treatment | 4C | An insert or plug is not firmly attached to a helmet. The insert/plug drops during a treatment. Cause the treatment to stop. |
82 | Treatment monitoring | Poor choice of treatment sequence | Poor user choice | Ineffective treatment process | 4C | On 4C, when multiple helmets, multiple Gamma angles, high/low docking are involved, it is necessary to figure out a treatment sequence that minimizes the treatment time. |
12 | Frame positioning/fixation | Inappropriate frame placement |
1. Lack of training/experience 2. Miscommunication |
Inconvenience (staff and patient) | Both | The stereotactic frame is not shifted correctly when treating a peripheral lesion. A collision with the helmets (on the 4C) or the source cap (on the Perfexion) is reported from the planning system. Frame and imaging need to be repeated. |
67 | Lock patient | Incorrect patient setup | Personnel omission | Very wrong dose distribution | Both | Patient setup with wrong stereotactic coordinates in the trunnion mode. Patient setup at a wrong Gamma angle. On the Perfexion treatment can not start with a wrong Gamma angle. |
68 | Lock patient | Patient head position not firmly fixed |
1. Bad equipment 2. Personnel omission |
Wrong dose distribution | Both | It is good practice to check if the patient head is fixed properly before a treatment. Equipment failure, untighten or loose screws may cause unsecured patient head position. This is more important for the trunnion mode on the 4C. |
78 | Treatment monitoring | Treated shots not recorded correctly |
1. Lack of standard procedure 2. Procedure not followed 3. Personnel omission |
Very wrong dose Very wrong dose distribution |
Both | Delivered shots are not followed closely and recorded correctly on the treatment copy. Cause confusion in the shots that have been delivered. This happens more likely on 4C with trunnion shots. |